A researcher who uses carbon dating on ancient times

Since the flood was accompanied by much volcanism (see Noah's Flood…, How did animals get from the Ark to isolated places? ), fossils formed in the early post-flood period would give radiocarbon ages older than they really are.In summary, the carbon-14 method, when corrected for the effects of the flood, can give useful results, but needs to be applied carefully.

For example, potassium-40 decays to argon-40; uranium-238 decays to lead-206 via other elements like radium; uranium-235 decays to lead-207; rubidium-87 decays to strontium-87; etc.

To derive ages from such measurements, unprovable assumptions have to be made such as: There is plenty of evidence that the radioisotope dating systems are not the infallible techniques many think, and that they are not measuring millions of years. For example, deeper rocks often tend to give older “ages.” Creationists agree that the deeper rocks are generally older, but not by millions of years.

Geologist John Woodmorappe, in his devastating critique of radioactive dating,[8] points out that there are other large-scale trends in the rocks that have nothing to do with radioactive decay.

That is, they take up less than would be expected and so they test older than they really are.

Furthermore, different types of plants discriminate differently.

Search for a researcher who uses carbon dating on ancient times:

a researcher who uses carbon dating on ancient times-6a researcher who uses carbon dating on ancient times-87a researcher who uses carbon dating on ancient times-58

It cannot be used to date volcanic rocks, for example.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “a researcher who uses carbon dating on ancient times”